Closed saurabhgup1 closed 2 years ago
Hi,
Please try modifying the eps_start
value given as input to the algorithm to see if you can find a better initialisation. The chosen epsilon value (half of the maximum value) was tested on larger, sparse matrices and works well to balance convergence quality and speed. I haven't tuned it to dense, very unbalanced matrices as you have here.
You can read more about the algorithm here.
For example, if I set eps_start = 1
, auction_solve
produces the correct output.
Hope this helps!
thanks for the quick response @OllieBoyne As I tried for larger sparse matrices as well and results are totally different than scipy. That didn't give me confidence. So, when ever I want to run auction_solve as a best practice get the half of the maximum cost value and use that as eps_start?
The start value of epsilon will affect the convergence. For many sparse problems, initialising at half of the maximum value provides a good starting point. If you find this isn't the case, you should experiment with what value works well for your problem.
Hi,
I was trying to use auction solver in one of my solution. While comparing it to scipy linear sum assignment I saw results are not same. Attached is an example with 1 object and 8 people. Scipy is picking the right value (40.4) and auction solver failed to pick it.