An unnoticed side effect of having switched from SILE's ragged environments to our own via paragraph styling in 3a16ef1f96949fe7460ce004d347972ceef67f51
The former don't support nesting, but cancel parindent; the latter support (r/l skip) nesting but doesn't touch the parindent (by design, on purpose!)... And see details further below.
Workaround:
Override the default style in the document's style file:
If we generalize the above, §3.1 in the manual might need an update too
another solution would be to fully cancel the parindent in folios generically, which I thought we did with a SILE.call("noindent"), but paragraph styles re-enable it currently (= the default is true)
There might be more than meets the eye, here (wrong default?), to check.
EDIT: And we also have to check how SILE issue 1699 gets addressed, because we are also in that situation (temporary environment), with parindent scoping issues.
Oops.
An unnoticed side effect of having switched from SILE's ragged environments to our own via paragraph styling in 3a16ef1f96949fe7460ce004d347972ceef67f51 The former don't support nesting, but cancel parindent; the latter support (r/l skip) nesting but doesn't touch the parindent (by design, on purpose!)... And see details further below.
Workaround:
Override the default style in the document's style file:
Note
SILE.call("noindent")
, but paragraph styles re-enable it currently (= the default is true)There might be more than meets the eye, here (wrong default?), to check.
EDIT: And we also have to check how SILE issue 1699 gets addressed, because we are also in that situation (temporary environment), with parindent scoping issues.