Should tissue be child of 'object aggregate'?

OmniSearch / ncro

Non-Coding RNA Ontology

Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International

5 stars 3 forks source link

Should tissue be child of 'object aggregate'? #23

Open linikujp opened 8 years ago

linikujp commented 8 years ago

I think tissue maybe just child of 'anatomical structure'.

alanruttenberg commented 8 years ago

It is already so, in the branch.

linikujp commented 8 years ago

Sorry, the title was misleading. Let me rephrase it. Currently, tissue is both child of 'object aggregate' and 'anatomical structure'. Should tissue have only one parent term? And I think it should be 'anatomical structure'.

alanruttenberg commented 8 years ago

I agree. In any case I don't use the object, object aggregate, and fiat object part terms in ontologies I edit as they are not univocal.