Closed pedropaulofb closed 2 years ago
I agree with you, it would be nice to include these files. However, my trial license expired and I can't export the original diagrams at the moment.
I guess there are no publications about this ontology, but we still should have a references.bib
file.
There is this paper: https://www.scitepress.org/Papers/2011/36952/36952.pdf
It does not describe the ontology, but the project in which the ontology was created.
The Portuguese text in the ontology.json
seems to be enconded in Windows 1252
. I'll look into how to export that properly.
I'm going to work on the issues here reported in a few hours. I'll create the references.bib file and also I'll try to generate the original diagrams. Please wait up to 12h CET at most.
@Matt-81, could you please test the ontology.json
file with your code? It should be fine now
The original diagrams were created, however, I couldn't automate the creation of the files' names. The manual creation is going to take a long time... does someone know how can we do that?
The original diagrams were created, however, I couldn't automate the creation of the files' names. The manual creation is going to take a long time... does someone know how can we do that?
How do you expect to automate this and why doesn't EA export diagrams with their correct names?
I reduced the size of new diagrams in about 60% using PNG compression services.
The original diagrams were created, however, I couldn't automate the creation of the files' names. The manual creation is going to take a long time... does someone know how can we do that?
How do you expect to automate this and why doesn't EA export diagrams with their correct names?
I couldn't find any EA feature to export all diagrams in png format, only individual ones. So I created a PDF report with all diagrams and then transformed them to images.
@claudenirmf Tested, it works and all the associations are present!
Can we add the original diagrams to this submission? What about adding the original Enterprise Architect file here too? Just to allows us to review it later.