search

OntoUML / ontouml-models

The OntoUML/UFO Catalog is a collaborative, structured and open-source catalog of OntoUML and UFO ontology models.
https://w3id.org/ontouml-models/
Other
45 stars 44 forks source link

Add 8 new models and updates #286

Closed pedropaulofb closed 1 month ago

pedropaulofb commented 2 months ago

Eight new models added. All models were sent via the catalog's Google Forms after we got in contact with the authors.

Model updated:

All ttl files with the outdated purl.org Catalog URIs have been updated to the latest w3id.org URI.

pedropaulofb commented 2 months ago

@tgoprince, thank you for the review. All recommended adjustments have been made. Can you please review the PR again?

The modifications made were basically:

pedropaulofb commented 1 month ago

@tgoprince , I fixed the mgic2011 dataset, which had non-OntoUML models. You can review it now.

tgoprince commented 1 month ago

I found two URIs for MIT licenses:

Let's stick with one of them?

tgoprince commented 1 month ago

The file sariev2024/metadata.yaml contains a google drive link as a landing page: https://drive.google.com/drive/folders/1Y0ZbJ1RgKvVJZWORznzWLptFPQN5G2m5

The link also resolves to a folder containing only some diagrams in png files.

This does not fit the definition of landing page we agreed upon for this project.

pedropaulofb commented 1 month ago

I found two URIs for MIT licenses:

Let's stick with one of them?

Yes. Thanks for noticing. The correct one is https://opensource.org/license/mit.

I am making the necessary substitutions.

pedropaulofb commented 1 month ago

The file sariev2024/metadata.yaml contains a google drive link as a landing page: https://drive.google.com/drive/folders/1Y0ZbJ1RgKvVJZWORznzWLptFPQN5G2m5

The link also resolves to a folder containing only some diagrams in png files.

This does not fit the definition of landing page we agreed upon for this project.

The DCAT 3's definition of landing page is:

A Web page that can be navigated to in a Web browser to gain access to the catalog, a dataset, its distributions and/or additional information.

The Google Drive's page do contain additional information about the model. Shouldn't we consider it as a valid landing page? Please reconsider.

pedropaulofb commented 1 month ago

@tgoprince, I addressed all the mentioned problems. Please check whether I should remove of not sariev2024's landing page. If you still believe it is the best option, let me know and then I will remove it asap.

tgoprince commented 1 month ago

@pedropaulofb, the Google Drive link redirects to a page contain tree pdfs, each of which contain a single diagram. It does not even provide access to the actual file containing the model. Moreover, Google Drive links are very easily broken. I honestly, do not see any value of keeping this link as is.

I suggest we reject temporary URLs like this one all the metadata fields we collect.

pedropaulofb commented 1 month ago

@pedropaulofb, the Google Drive link redirects to a page contain tree pdfs, each of which contain a single diagram. It does not even provide access to the actual file containing the model. Moreover, Google Drive links are very easily broken. I honestly, do not see any value of keeping this link as is.

I suggest we reject temporary URLs like this one all the metadata fields we collect.

Ok! I already removed the URL from the metadata.