search

OntoUML / ontouml-vp-plugin

A plugin for Visual Paradigm to add support for OntoUML modeling and model intelligence services
Apache License 2.0
40 stars 15 forks source link

Addition of formal stereotype to associations #84

Open brunogcarneiro opened 3 years ago

brunogcarneiro commented 3 years ago

I right clicked over an association and navigate to "OntoUML Stereotypes" but I cannot find the option "<formal>".

v. release 0.4.0

tprincesales commented 3 years ago

Hi Bruno,

The plugin contains only OntoUML 2.0 stereotypes, as proposed in our recent papers:

  1. Guizzardi, G., Fonseca, C. M., Benevides, A. B., Almeida, J. P. A., Porello, D., & Sales, T. P. (2018, October). Endurant types in ontology-driven conceptual modeling: Towards OntoUML 2.0. In International Conference on Conceptual Modeling (pp. 136-150). Springer, Cham.

  2. Fonseca, C. M., Porello, D., Guizzardi, G., Almeida, J. P. A., & Guarino, N. (2019, November). Relations in ontology-driven conceptual modeling. In International Conference on Conceptual Modeling (pp. 28-42). Springer, Cham.

To make the language more precise, we removed «formal» from OntoUML and replaced with «comparative» and «externalDependence» (see 2 for more details).

brunogcarneiro commented 3 years ago

Thanks!

pedropaulofb commented 3 months ago

I would like to reopen this issue because seems that <> is a valid relation stereotype option. For instance, this is the stereotype used for the relations between capabilities (e.g., enables, disables, adds, substracts, triggers), as seen in the recent developments from Calhau's works.

Could you please consider the addition of this stereotype in the plugin? Thanks in advance.