Open taneltm opened 8 months ago
I've seen several notation variants, I don't understand which one is more traditional. Need more examples or a full description. For example, it seemed to me that a comma is not the equivalent of an arrow in traditional variant. And 1, 1+2, 3~4
must be like that:
Would it be possible to support a more traditional input notation style, maybe with a different code-block name?
+
.So, instead of
uf,3+4
, it would beuf+3+4
and as+
is optionaluf3+4
would also be the same. With the traditional notation style,uf,3+4
would actually be the same asuf,n,3+4
.~
for sliding motion. So, instead of[,3,4,]
, it would be3~4
.-
So, instead of1,-,1+2,-,[,3,4,]
you would write1, 1+2, 3~4
The comma before the space would be optional, so you could write This way you could write:d+1+2 [AOP]
- pressing the buttons leads to AOP - no green arrow1, [AOP]
- after a 1 jab, you should go into AOP - green arrow between 1 and AOPSSR, d1+2 [AOP], "continue on whiff, otherwise cancel stance", uf3 (launch)
This would allow the comma+space combination to be used in hints.f,n,d,df+2
you could also writef,n,d,d/f+2
Wouldn't personally use it, but some do and it's probably easy to add.Full example:
Btw, cool plugin!