Almost all applications using the VT client want to update values in their displayed pool. Since both the VT server and your application (VT client) track these values, syncing and/or tracking the values of these variables can be cumbersome and time-consuming. Worry no more, with a easy-to-use and out-of-the-box helper class we should be able to solve this issue.
My initial idea for the system flow behind the helper:
when you want to change a tracked value from the VT client:
when we receive a response from the VT server:
Does this make sense and would it work? The changes in tracked value coming from macros, still needs to be worked out
Almost all applications using the VT client want to update values in their displayed pool. Since both the VT server and your application (VT client) track these values, syncing and/or tracking the values of these variables can be cumbersome and time-consuming. Worry no more, with a easy-to-use and out-of-the-box helper class we should be able to solve this issue.
My initial idea for the system flow behind the helper:
Does this make sense and would it work? The changes in tracked value coming from macros, still needs to be worked out