Open jacobyavis opened 2 months ago
TWG Notes - Sep 12 This should definitely be implemented with a YES / NO / UNKNOWN implementation instead of a straight boolean However that could be annoying to have to put UNKNOWN on all other types of convertibles (besides SAFE). Just make it nullable instead and assume that if it's omitted, then it's unknown.
Description of Enhancement :
To provide a way for OCX to specify that a side letter exists and should be considered for a given convertible
Why is this Needed?
While we now have the Documents schema and can include the side letter there, it may still be worthwhile to have a boolean field on the Convertible Issuance to serve as a reminder that applicable side letter(s) exist for this security.
Anything else we need to know?
Created while working through the comments sheet attached to issue #507