Digital Wallet Providers SHALL implement DIDs as cryptographic identifiers.
Section 4.1.1 Identifiers for Enterprise Identity already deals with DID requirements. Thus, whatever is deemed useful wording in section 4.1.6. should be moved into 4.1.1
Triage:
[x] Is Issue appropriate for OCI Architecture
[x] Assign Size
[x] Assign Priority
[x] Assign Label (if needed)
[x] OCI affected Artifacts Identified
[ ] Assign Triage - Artifact Version Target (v x.x.x Milestone)
[ ] Assign Triage - Interop Profile Version Target (v x.x.x Milestone)
[ ] Create sub-project (if needed)
Affected Parties (help determine Sunrise/Sunset):
[ ] Trading Partners
[ ] Issuers
[x] Wallet Solutions
[ ] PI Verification Solutions
Affected Parties (help determine Sunrise/Sunset):
[ ] Trading Partners
[ ] Issuers
[x] Wallet Solutions
[ ] PI Verification Solutions
Affected OCI Artifact
[ ] Schema Document
[ ] Identity Schema
[ ] ATP Schema
[ ] Issuer Conformance Criteria
[x] Wallet Conformance Criteria
[ ] VRS Solution Conformance Criteria
[ ] Wallet API Specification
[ ] Governance Document
[ ] Conformance Program
[ ] OCI Website
[ ] Internal Process
Change Category (Guides Steering Review)
- Steering/Industry Review
[ ] Business-Level (May affect business operations)
[ ] OCI Governance, Policy or website feature
- Steering/Industry Notification
[x] Technical-Level (Does not affect business operations)
Steering summary section 4.16. contains content that should be in section 4.1.1. suggest to tidy this up.
The focus of this section is on using a specifci VC data model. Yet is states:
4.1.6 Credential Structure
Section 4.1.1 Identifiers for Enterprise Identity already deals with DID requirements. Thus, whatever is deemed useful wording in section 4.1.6. should be moved into 4.1.1
Triage:
Affected Parties (help determine Sunrise/Sunset):
Affected Parties (help determine Sunrise/Sunset):
Affected OCI Artifact
Change Category (Guides Steering Review)
- Steering/Industry Review
- Steering/Industry Notification
Communication