Closed m-mohr closed 2 months ago
@aljacob @edzer @bschumac Any thoughts from your side?
I got a new template of the OGC submission document today.
I compared it to the old template and it has changes with regards to the implementations (chapter: "Evidence of implementation"), the adoption (chapter: "Information on adoption") and the motivation (chapter: "Motivation").
I restructured the document accordingly, but now I need your help and input:
PSC: Looks good, we'll keep it open for additions to the implementation until Friday EOB and then I'll send it to OGC.
Based on the feedback we got from OGC, I started rewording the OGC submission document. The focus is to make more clear that we submit a specification (openEO) that consists of two sub-specifications (API + Processes) and that any software is not part of the submission. The software is just mentioned to prove adoption.
Please provide feedback via the GitHub PR review mechanism as we don't have a close next meeting scheduled. If we need a meeting to further discuss, we can set up an ad hoc meeting.