Open soxofaan opened 10 months ago
I think that's fine. I'd also assume that if you request the signed document later and it was updated in the meanwhile (e.g. status, title) it is also updated.
Would you be up to create a PR for clairification? @soxofaan
-> #516
will conflict with #513 (#507)
Yes, I think #513 is not ideal.
(related to https://github.com/Open-EO/openeo-api/issues/507 and https://github.com/Open-EO/openeo-aggregator/issues/115)
Say
/jobs/{job_id}/results
has a canonical link, e.g./jobs/{job_id}/results?signature=123
. Can/jobs/{job_id}/results?signature=123
contain another canonical link, say/jobs/{job_id}/results?signature=456
e.g. with updated expiry timestamp?Strict interpretation of
seems to forbid that: must be exact same document?
However, it would be useful for long term execution situations (and crossbackend execution) that the expiry of signed batch job result url can be bumped by this way.