Closed EmileSonneveld closed 4 months ago
With start
it seems to be sorted on properties>date. Not on the published date, is that stable enough?
https://services.terrascope.be/catalogue//collections?startIndex=1&count=200&sortKeys=start
data = JSON.parse(document.querySelector("#jsonFormatterRaw > pre").innerText)
console.table(data["features"].map(x=>x["properties"]))
I added the sort key anyway. There are multiple products with the same date tough. I guess that after that, it sorted based on when the product was added to the database.
I added the sort key anyway. There are multiple products with the same date tough. I guess that after that, it sorted based on when the product was added to the database.
It's probably me but I don't see how this list is sorted on date
now.
You could go check with Stijn C. to see if there is a particular sortKeys
that allows reliable paging or just take the pragmatic approach: remove the paging altogether and increase the page size to e.g. 500.
Stijn C says that by default, features are sorted by ID: https://git.vito.be/projects/BIGGEO/repos/oscars/browse/src/main/java/be/vito/opensearch/elasticsearch/SearchOperation.java#85 To be sure I added a warning when it misbehaves. (Still running tests) If in any way, a feature got returned multiple times, the one on the last page would be preserved. I added a log for this, and it did not happen on CI at least
Bigger page size, check multiple pages, dedup for when running in auto tests. Only check next page when needed