There is a slight difference between python & and python and :
Given A and B is true and is not boolean,
A and B => B
B and A => A
A & B == B & A
Currently, python-client outputs logical and for & operator (which needs to be addressed in that repo).
and is simply ignored.
I have made an implementation of bitwise_and, or and xor processes. I assume that if we always use bitwise operators, we should stay out of trouble famous last words....). I will post a PR later.
Working with packed bitmasks requires bitwise operators is not possible today.
EXAMPLE:
and so on.....
There is a slight difference between python & and python and : Given A and B is true and is not boolean,
Currently, python-client outputs logical and for & operator (which needs to be addressed in that repo). and is simply ignored.
I have made an implementation of bitwise_and, or and xor processes. I assume that if we always use bitwise operators, we should stay out of trouble famous last words....). I will post a PR later.