Open bossie opened 9 months ago
In the current version of the Projection STAC extension, it should indeed be "properties"/"proj:epsg"
Re: older standards: my first impression is that epsg at the top level was never really part of the STAC spec or the Projection extension.
I had a look at the STAC spec v0.0.9, v0.0.8 and the previous version of the Projection extension (v1.0.0) but as far as I can tell they also expect "properties"/"proj:epsg" (going by the examples they provide).
To fully confirm it I would have to dig deeper. But another indication is that a few bits of the stacspec changelog indicate that in older versions they were using eo:epsg rather than epsg at the top level. Some changelog messages say they moved from using eo:epsg
in an older standard, to proj:epsg
.
There was never an espg property as far as I can recall. It's been proj:epsg for years now.
A batch job results item has a top-level
"epsg"
property:I would expect
"properties"/"proj:epsg"
instead but I'm not sure if this is maybe according to an older version of STAC.@JohanKJSchreurs?