Open jurra opened 4 years ago
I agree. Especially with giving them tasks/review jobs before the call. I'd say they can review the general accessibility of the project? Thinks they liked or didn't like?
For peer review I also agree with tasks before the call. Adding to what Alex mentioned above and considering the next one is closer to the end of the project, we could ask reviewers to see how far they would get in if they were to repdroduce the hardware they are reviewing:
On terms of the project and how open it is to others: are communication channels clearly stated, are there first issues, how often main developers responded to questions/suggestions on issues, etc..
@amchagas this questions are assesing documentation which is a subject that I believe we will cover after week 8 Documentation is planned in for week 10: https://openhardware4.me/open-hardware-leaders.github.io/Program/17_Week10.html
We can also provide as a complement document the checklist for open source hardware. But again this one will come for sure in week 10.
5 minutes to read the Readme and contrib and give feedback on the following points:
Readme
Contribute
This 1st peer review had little to none peer reviewing. It was more a pitch with interesting exchange, questions, insights.
If we want to make it a peer review we can: