Closed Andrea-Campanella closed 6 months ago
Fixed as part of #393 and #408
This bug was not fixed in TAPI v2.1, could it be push a change to v2.1-bug-fixes version?
This issue has been closed due to the lack of activity for more than one year. Please reopen it if follow up is necessary.
I generated the following tree (see figure down the mail) from yang git. Branch develop, yang files 2018-12-10.
To create a connectivity service:
I) For OTSi, I can see that for each end-point,
there is a tapi-photonic-media:otsi-connectivity-service-end-point-spec
within that container, there is a otsi-config container.
I can specify the central-frequency, spectrum and application identifier.
(Out of otsi-config) I can set the modulation and laser control, and transmit power.
II) Now, for Media Channel, trying to mimic OTSI...
There is tapi-photonic-media:media-channel-service-interface-point-spec . I wondered why it is named service-interface-point spec and not media-channel-connectivity-service-end-point-spec
There is a mc-pool, shouldn't it be mc-config?
In mc-config (it does not make sense to have supportable, available, occupied) I should provide upper and lower . Most data is non-config.
I am guessing there may be an issue. Taking a look at Yang, IMHO, this is not "right"
diff --git a/YANG/tapi-photonic-media@2018-12-10.yang b/YANG/tapi-photonic-media@2018-12-10.yang index dc69c76..1936dd3 100755 --- a/YANG/tapi-photonic-media@2018-12-10.yang +++ b/YANG/tapi-photonic-media@2018-12-10.yang @@ -109,8 +109,8 @@ module tapi-photonic-media { description "none"; } augment "/tapi-common:context/tapi-connectivity:connectivity-context/tapi-connectivity:connectivity-service/tapi-connectivity:end-point" {
With this change, the tree seems correct and I can have
Thanks for the contribution to Ramon Casellas