The tapi-connectivity:connectivity-service/diversity-policy and the tapi-connectivity:connectivity-service/topology/node/link-inclusion constrains can be potentially incompatible.
In general the usage of some diversity-policies defined is not clear:
NODE, LINK policies -> My assumption is when you include this policy within a connectivity-service, that service should be disjoint to the list of NODE/LINKs another service’s (within diversity-exclusion attribute?) route travels across.
SRLG, SRNG-> In general the definition of SRGs is not clear to me.
The tapi-connectivity:connectivity-service/diversity-policy and the tapi-connectivity:connectivity-service/topology/node/link-inclusion constrains can be potentially incompatible. In general the usage of some diversity-policies defined is not clear: