Open alfredogonzalezmuniz opened 4 years ago
Additionally, it would be required to add further status information across the whole equipment model.
Taking as a reference the IETF yang model for Hardware Management https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/rfc8348/, it may be worthy to analyze to include similar information in TAPI too.
Reviewing the tapi-equipment model the "common-actual-properties" container needs a leaf for the protection-status of the card. Mainly for cross-connect boards but also for others
leaf is-protected { type enumeration { enum WORKING { description “Working board with a backup board"; } enum PROTECTION { description " Protection board ready for backup in case of failure of the working board "; } enum NO_PROTECTED { description " Simple board without protection or backup board "; } } description “Crossconnetion boards and other protected boards need to expose the status of the protection and wich is the working and the protection board in a 1+1 or a 1+N protection scenario";