Closed demx8as6 closed 5 years ago
The comparsion of list and container statements between 3rd PoC and 4th PoC showed that there is only this one difference.
Proposed modification:
demx8as6@controller:~/temp/CENTENNIAL/models/yang$ git diff microwave-model.yang
diff --git a/models/yang/microwave-model.yang b/models/yang/microwave-model.yang
index 719347f..86970eb 100644
--- a/models/yang/microwave-model.yang
+++ b/models/yang/microwave-model.yang
@@ -26,5 +26,5 @@ module microwave-model {
description "This module contains a collection of YANG definitions for managing wireless networks.";
- revision 2017-03-20 {
+ revision 2017-03-24 {
description "Initial version";
reference "ONF TR 532: A YANG Data Model for Wireless Networks.";
}
@@ -1332,7 +1332,12 @@ module microwave-model {
}
description "Aggregated performance information of the air interface for a pre-defined measurement interval.";
}
- container co-channel-group {
+ list co-channel-group {
+ key 'co-channel-group-id';
+ uses co-channel-group-g;
+ description "none";
+ }
+ grouping co-channel-group-g {
leaf co-channel-group-id {
type core-model:universal-id;
description "none";
demx8as6@controller:~/temp/CENTENNIAL/models/yang$
@pezou: I added you to the contributors - please comment as well - many thanks!
What would you want me to do, keep it as group or restore it to list?
I haven't changed that yang model since the beginning of poc3, please let me know what do you have in mind and I will do it.
Best regards Liu
Sent from my iPhone
On 26 Mar 2017, at 8:09 PM, Martin Skorupski notifications@github.com wrote:
Assigned #17 to @olinchy.
— You are receiving this because you were mentioned. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub, or mute the thread.
@demx8as6 it's fine for me , I have not implemented co-channel-group yet.
fixed - with microwave-model@2019-03-23.yang
Michael discovered that the co-channel-group is now just a yang container, but was a yang list before.