Now that we have a "baseline" how do motivate not having learning cost? Because our motivation has been that we do not have a proper baseline, but now we are using fairly detailed assumptions
E.g. if our baseline for country X states 10% LPG in urban areas every urban cell will have 10% LPG in the start year. Then if LPG becomes the stove with the highest net-benefit we could say the learning only applies to 90%?
Would it hold to say that we omitted learning cost because it is such a small part of the costs? Marc said this in our call, but I would like to have a source that we can actually source and not say "expert opinion"
Now that we have a "baseline" how do motivate not having learning cost? Because our motivation has been that we do not have a proper baseline, but now we are using fairly detailed assumptions
E.g. if our baseline for country X states 10% LPG in urban areas every urban cell will have 10% LPG in the start year. Then if LPG becomes the stove with the highest net-benefit we could say the learning only applies to 90%?
Would it hold to say that we omitted learning cost because it is such a small part of the costs? Marc said this in our call, but I would like to have a source that we can actually source and not say "expert opinion"