Closed Mitmischer closed 3 years ago
The approach should be correct.
On first glance, you are missing an "n" in the formula:
likely the clearance rates are quite small (<< 1) and thus you don't see the change on top of the static "10" that is currently added in the formula.
Hope that helps, Stephan
Well, that's embarassing - you're right! Thanks a lot :)
No worries, it happens to the best ;-)
Hello,
I set up urinary clearance via tubular secretion in PK-Sim and exported the model to Mobi. I have ~20 metabolites in the system and for ~each 10, I need to monitor the total secretion rate. Plotting would be nice to have, but availability in the R Toolbox would be fine.
In the passive transports tab, I found the Renal Clearances for each metabolite. I checked the "Create ... parameter on each" for each of them and I verified that those are plausible. They are located in the neighborhood between kidney plasma und urine:
Finally, I defined two custom parameters that add the process rate parameters. One of them looks like this:
However, this does not work. If I plot UrinaryRate_Deconj, it will be a constant 10 (which leads me to the conclustion that each
n_i
is just 1 and not updated. That confuses me as the rates themselves are plausible and not 1 during the whole simulation. Am I doing something the wrong way or is that a bug?