Closed PavelBal closed 2 years ago
I think this makes sense
So I suggest to re-implement this.
I disagree with this. I think we could offer something else but I would not change this. I remember that we had raised the point back then and it was deemed perfectly acceptable to have the PK over the aggregated curves
27.04.2022 - do not re-implement.
Instead: In pk-analyses view, show two tabs - pk parameters calculated from the curves (as it is implemented now, do not change anything), and pk-parametes based on individual values.
Separate task - documentation.
Do we have an example to show how much the outcomes may differ (PK Property of aggregated curve vs calculating it from mean/percentiles of the individual PK Properties)?
02.05.2022:
NaN
from "Calculated based on curves"Remove rows containing NaN from "Calculated based on curves"
Why? Also note that you can have NaN is one cell but.not on the next one.
Why? Also note that you can have NaN is one cell but.not on the next one.
No, for population simulations actually not. The bw-normalized values are not calculated for observed data.
Lol, PK-Parameters are not calculated for observed data in a population simulation, at all.
So these rows are always showing NaN
but not when you have simulated curve right?
Ok Ithink this is implemented
PK-parameters for population simulations are currently calculated for the selected aggregated curves. I.e., when selecting "arithmetic mean" as an output, the AUC is calculated for the curve that is generated from the individual results.
However, I would expect to have the arithematic mean of all individual AUC values instaed. The same goes e.g. for "5th percentile" - what we get now is the AUC of the curve but not really the 5th percentile of all AUC values.
So I suggest to re-implement this. Good news - we already have all individual PK parameter values as they can be shown e.g. in a BoxPlot. This approach would also allow to calculate the body-weight scaled parameters that are currently shown as
NaN
• AUC_inf_norm • AUC_tEnd_norm • C_max_norm • Total body clearance/F (not quite clear what it is, documentation missing) • Vd(plasma)/F • Vss(plasma)/F
and to also calculate ranges like "arithmetic standard deviation" or the "geometric standard deviation".
@Yuri05 @msevestre @sfrechen @StephanSchaller
@abdelr FYI