Open Yuri05 opened 1 year ago
@msevestre @PavelBal I'm quite sure we already had this requirement entered somewhere, but I could not find it.
Hmmm I cannot remember that we discussed exactly this, that events should be defined in the same way as administration protocols.
@PavelBal I have entered the description. The idea is not the replacement of the current events definition, but an additional option for that (coupled with administrations)
Additionally to the current way of adding events to simulations: it should be possible to couple events with administration protocol.
E.g. for the advanced administration protocol it could look like this:
When creating a simulation: non-empty Event placeholders from the administration protocol schema must be mapped to the Events (defined under Events building block i the same way as now). The mapping should be done in the same way as now for the formulations:
More flexible solution would be: allow not just one event per administration, but a list of events, e.g. the user could set:
E.g. for the simple adm. protocol could be something like this: