Open SRuedesh opened 5 years ago
Hey @sruedesh Thanks for pointing that out. I'll have to investigate a bit and will get back to you shortly. It could be that the documention is outdated. In that case, you could even propose a change ;-)
I'll let you know
@SRuedesh So I double-checked the code I think the documentation is indeed misleading
What is meant is: (0,0) is present by default
As you can see, if I create a NEW table formulation, it automatically looks like so
with a (0,0) point added automatically. Why would you want to remove the first (0, 0) point? Maybe to simulate some kind of delay in the dissolution function ? (@Yuri05 would that be correct?)
Please feel free to suggest an improvement in the documentation. Here is how :)
https://docs.open-systems-pharmacology.org/how-to-contribute
Hope that helps, Michael
Dear OSPS community,
I stumbled upon an issue regarding the table formulation for tablet dissolution. The OSPS documentation states that
which lead me to the conclusion, that there would be no difference, whether or not I specified 0, 0 within the table. However, while testing out different dissolution profiles I discovered, that not specifying 0, 0 led to interesting results:
The dashed lines represent the fraction dissolved and the solid lines represent the corresponding plasma concentration-time profile. The simulations are identical, apart from the table formulation. To illustrate the issue I created minimal (hypothetical) dissolution profiles.
Table formulation "blue simulation":
Table formulation "red simulation":
all the more confusing. In case this is the intended behaviour, something along the lines of
probably makes more sense.