Open dkarlovi opened 4 years ago
@ybelenko WDYT?
I'm always open to renaming and refactoring, because like to use the latest versions of packages all the time. I don't know whether @wing328 will approve it.
The second questions is... do we have contributors to implement new 5 php client generators :smile:
I tried to upgrade current 5 php generators and it took a lot of time, feels like a real job. Beside I was unemployed from November 2019 and had infinite free time not like other contributors. And you suggest to add another 5 :smile:
Of course we can push few PRs and create alpha versions of them, like deprecated php-silex
. It looks like deprecated before it was even finished.
So..... I'm totally vote for it, but I don't know who can implement it.
I'm suggesting adding one new generator (which could optionally implement specific libraries), not five.
The featureset I'm thinking about:
-l
support to add specific libraries (but not right away, in the future, this would only put in the ground work, might add Symfony as a first step)So my idea is to start very small, but keep quality and consistency high by using all the automation tools the modern PHP ecosystem has to offer.
- Handlebars by default, allowing for (hopefully) more easier implementation (I have no Handlebars experience so don't know how powerful it actually is, hope it's a lot better than Mustache)
I never used Handlebars either, but if it can solve nested variables issue I would vote for it.
I'm not sure that users need templates feature at all, because I found recently popular implementation which works with OpenAPI spec file directly. Here is the link cebe/yii2-openapi on Packagist. It's crazy if we will have to deprecate templates completely when all frameworks will be able to parse spec and generate all the code on their own...
- PDS compatible
Looks interesting, didn't know about that standard. I could implement it in php-slim4
server for sure.
- in the future, support for adding OAuth client support (adding for example League OAuth2 client as a dependency, integrating it)
By the way, did you find at least one official PHP implementation of OAuth2
? I saw only the official pack with interfaces. I consider to develop my own package with OAuth2
implementation covered with tests when I have time.
UPD: Sorry, misread your message, you're talking about client OAuth2
while I think about server implementation.
Is your feature request related to a problem? Please describe.
We should discuss the fact that
php
is the client which you should be able to ask to build Symfony bindings (bundle) similar tophp-symfony
(but as a client, obviously). Currently the other PHP generators are all servers (AFAIK?), but you wouldn't know it from the names alone:php-symfony
could also mean "PHP client with Symfony bindings".Describe the solution you'd like
One direction I'm considering is to add support for
-l
to the generator which would allow you to add a specific library like-l laravel
or-l symfony
.Describe alternatives you've considered
Adding a new generator
php-client
, which would in turn deprecatephp
down the line. This approach would also allow fixing issues across PHP generators like #2273 from the start.