Closed woodmd closed 8 years ago
We might have to take a leaf out of the conda-forge book and build on a different CI server.
Are there are any plans to revisit this? I realize that RHEL6 is a pretty old distribution but many institutions still use it in their computing cluster environments (my own for instance). I presume that this issue will come up whenever you have compiled extensions so having a solution for this would generally be useful for packages beyond healpy and also going forward as CI services migrate to newer versions of Linux.
Are there are any plans to revisit this?
@woodmd -- yes.
TL;DR: will take at least a few days to get it set up, but the need is real and not unique to you.
I think the easiest fix (from our POV) is to get healply building on conda-forge, then copy that build to this channel. conda-forge already has the infrastructure set up for doing builds on older build machines. Adding that infrastructure to this repo (circle-ci with docker images) seems much more time consuming than simply using conda-forge and making the PR to the appropriate repo for allowing cross-channel package copying.
@woodmd -- can you please try this version of healpy and let me know either way if it works for you:
conda install -c conda-forge healpy
If it works, I'll copy that build into this channel (instead of us building it directly).
Yes the conda-forge version works on both SL6 and RHEL6. Thanks!
Just out of curiosity if healpy is available through conda-forge what is the motivation for providing it through openastronomy as well? Would there be any difference between the versions I would get from the conda-forge vs. openastronomy channel?
At this point there isn't much motivation, unless openastronomy has other packages you need that are not in conda-forge yet.
As conda-forge continues to grow I see things like openastronomy the astropy channel as collections of related packages that are actually built in conda-forge (their infrastructure is really nice).
Did you finish importing the conda-forge build into openastronomy? I just tried installing healpy from openastronomy but I'm still getting the GLIBC error.
Should get to it Sunday.
On Jun 11, 2016, 3:44 PM -0500, Matthew Woodnotifications@github.com, wrote:
Did you finish importing the conda-forge build into openastronomy? I just tried installing healpy from openastronomy but I'm getting the GLIBC error again.
— You are receiving this because you were assigned. Reply to this email directly,view it on GitHub(https://github.com/OpenAstronomy/conda-channel/issues/8#issuecomment-225393199), ormute the thread(https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe/ABGBHzSW0_3gDdFOJdtOvxKnUHksjRhOks5qKx42gaJpZM4H_iuF).
@woodmd -- the correct packages should be available now (still haven't automated that, but that is a separate issue...).
I'm closing this, but if you run into a problem please do reopen, or open a separate issue.
I've been experimenting with the healpy conda package but I'm encountering some problems when installing heapy on older Linux distributions -- specifically SL6 and RHEL6. When I try to import healpy I get an error about the version of glibc:
The problem seems to be that SL6/RHEL6 come with glibc 2.12 while the healpy conda package was compiled against glibc 2.14. Is there a workaround for this?