Closed wang007987 closed 1 week ago
The ThreadPool
class in src/net/src/thread_pool.cc
now includes a new boolean variable rsignal_wait
in the runInThread()
method. This variable determines whether the thread should wait for specific conditions on a condition variable rsignal_
before proceeding, thus enabling more flexible control over thread execution.
File | Change Summary |
---|---|
src/net/src/thread_pool.cc |
Added a boolean variable rsignal_wait to the runInThread() method. Modified rsignal_.wait() to use conditional checks. |
sequenceDiagram
participant Thread as Thread
participant ThreadPool as ThreadPool
participant RSignal as RSignal
Thread->>ThreadPool: start runInThread()
ThreadPool->>RSignal: rsignal_wait check
alt rsignal_wait is true
ThreadPool->>RSignal: wait()
RSignal-->>ThreadPool: signal received
else rsignal_wait is false
ThreadPool->>ThreadPool: continue without wait
end
ThreadPool->>Thread: execute task
In the realm of threads, a signal's cue,
Withrsignal_wait
, a change anew.
Some paths will pause, others flow,
Immediate tasks, with speed they go.
Threads dance wisely, in sync with fate,
A tune of code they orchestrate.~ Coderabbit 🐇✨
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?
@CodiumAI-Agent /review
⏱️ Estimated effort to review [1-5] | 3 |
🧪 Relevant tests | No |
🔒 Security concerns | No |
⚡ Key issues to review |
Possible Bug: The logic to reset rsignal_wait to true after waiting might lead to unexpected behavior or race conditions. It's important to ensure that the condition !queue_.empty() || !time_queue_.empty() || should_stop() is still valid after the lock is released and before it's acquired again. |
Performance Concern: The use of rsignal_.wait_for with a dynamic wait time based on exec_time - unow could lead to performance issues if not handled correctly, especially in a high-load scenario. This needs careful review to ensure it does not introduce latency or inefficiency. |
@wang007987 thank you for your PR. U have done a great job. Have u joined our Wechat group?
加上这个逻辑之后,线程还是优先执行到期的timertask吧? 感觉这两个应该拆开,在一个线程中执行不太好。 另外,现在pika中应该是没有用到timer_task。
Bot detected the issue body's language is not English, translate it automatically.
After adding this logic, the thread should still give priority to executing the expired timertask, right? It feels like these two should be separated, and it is not very good to execute them in one thread. In addition, timer_task should not be used in pika now.
sry, I think your pr maybe unuseful. I guess that u maybe wanna do task
immediately after waiting for timer task
. Because it costs much time for waiting. When jumping into wait
function, if task
is not empty, the wait
function will be out immediately and if task
is empty, the wait
function will be waiting. So i think there is no bug in logic.
不好意思,我认为你的 pr 作用不大,我认为你也许是想在等待完 timer task
后立刻执行 task
,因为等待需要花费很长时间。当进入 wait 函数的时候,如果 task
为空,wait
函数会直接返回,如果不为空,就继续等。所以我认为这里没有逻辑 bug。
Summary by CodeRabbit