Closed alchuu00 closed 8 months ago
i think i mentioned before the test coverage is already setup. it was set at 30pct. i do like we are setting it to 80pct if possible.
@umsu2 I made the changes you suggested to package.json
.
Also this is the test output now:
---------------------------|---------|----------|---------|---------|-------------------
File | % Stmts | % Branch | % Funcs | % Lines | Uncovered Line #s
---------------------------|---------|----------|---------|---------|-------------------
All files | 59.59 | 62.5 | 62.5 | 59.57 |
app | 0 | 100 | 0 | 0 |
layout.tsx | 0 | 100 | 0 | 0 | 1-9
page.tsx | 0 | 100 | 0 | 0 | 2-10
app/_component | 0 | 100 | 0 | 0 |
home-page.tsx | 0 | 100 | 0 | 0 | 1-3
app/about | 100 | 100 | 100 | 100 |
page.tsx | 100 | 100 | 100 | 100 |
app/join-us | 100 | 100 | 100 | 100 |
page.tsx | 100 | 100 | 100 | 100 |
app/projects | 0 | 100 | 0 | 0 |
page.tsx | 0 | 100 | 0 | 0 | 3-29
client-services | 100 | 50 | 100 | 100 |
github.client-service.ts | 100 | 50 | 100 | 100 | 29
components/banner | 100 | 100 | 100 | 100 |
banner.tsx | 100 | 100 | 100 | 100 |
components/footer | 0 | 100 | 0 | 0 |
footer.tsx | 0 | 100 | 0 | 0 | 3-21
components/header | 95 | 100 | 75 | 94.44 |
header-data.tsx | 100 | 100 | 100 | 100 |
header.tsx | 93.75 | 100 | 75 | 93.33 | 26
components/project | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
project.tsx | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3-27
mapper | 100 | 100 | 100 | 100 |
github.mapping.ts | 100 | 100 | 100 | 100 |
utils/header-map | 100 | 100 | 100 | 100 |
header-map.tsx | 100 | 100 | 100 | 100 |
---------------------------|---------|----------|---------|---------|-------------------
Jest: "global" coverage threshold for statements (80%) not met: 59.59%
Jest: "global" coverage threshold for branches (80%) not met: 62.5%
Jest: "global" coverage threshold for lines (80%) not met: 59.57%
Jest: "global" coverage threshold for functions (80%) not met: 62.5%
Based on this we need to write additional unit tests for the files above that don't have sufficient coverage. Should I open a new issue and start on that or do I have to make aditional changes to this PR?
Also this is the test output now:
---------------------------|---------|----------|---------|---------|------------------- File | % Stmts | % Branch | % Funcs | % Lines | Uncovered Line #s ---------------------------|---------|----------|---------|---------|------------------- All files | 59.59 | 62.5 | 62.5 | 59.57 | app | 0 | 100 | 0 | 0 | layout.tsx | 0 | 100 | 0 | 0 | 1-9 page.tsx | 0 | 100 | 0 | 0 | 2-10 app/_component | 0 | 100 | 0 | 0 | home-page.tsx | 0 | 100 | 0 | 0 | 1-3 app/about | 100 | 100 | 100 | 100 | page.tsx | 100 | 100 | 100 | 100 | app/join-us | 100 | 100 | 100 | 100 | page.tsx | 100 | 100 | 100 | 100 | app/projects | 0 | 100 | 0 | 0 | page.tsx | 0 | 100 | 0 | 0 | 3-29 client-services | 100 | 50 | 100 | 100 | github.client-service.ts | 100 | 50 | 100 | 100 | 29 components/banner | 100 | 100 | 100 | 100 | banner.tsx | 100 | 100 | 100 | 100 | components/footer | 0 | 100 | 0 | 0 | footer.tsx | 0 | 100 | 0 | 0 | 3-21 components/header | 95 | 100 | 75 | 94.44 | header-data.tsx | 100 | 100 | 100 | 100 | header.tsx | 93.75 | 100 | 75 | 93.33 | 26 components/project | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | project.tsx | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3-27 mapper | 100 | 100 | 100 | 100 | github.mapping.ts | 100 | 100 | 100 | 100 | utils/header-map | 100 | 100 | 100 | 100 | header-map.tsx | 100 | 100 | 100 | 100 | ---------------------------|---------|----------|---------|---------|------------------- Jest: "global" coverage threshold for statements (80%) not met: 59.59% Jest: "global" coverage threshold for branches (80%) not met: 62.5% Jest: "global" coverage threshold for lines (80%) not met: 59.57% Jest: "global" coverage threshold for functions (80%) not met: 62.5%
Based on this we need to write additional unit tests for the files above that don't have sufficient coverage. Should I open a new issue and start on that or do I have to make aditional changes to this PR?
Is there coverage reports that show line by line?
@SamHuo213 I am not sure if I understand what you mean.
Report like this?
@SamHuo213 I am not sure if I understand what you mean.
Report like this?
yup, does that get generated?
Another question, since our coverage does not meet the 80% threshold. What happens?
Another question, since our coverage does not meet the 80% threshold. What happens?
I believe that if our coverage doesn't meet 80% threshold then whenever we try to make pull request merge it will fail.
Another question, since our coverage does not meet the 80% threshold. What happens?
I believe that if our coverage doesn't meet 80% threshold then whenever we try to make pull request merge it will fail.
That's weird, I don't see any checks.
1) I think we need to ensure that if the coverage is not above 80% it fails the pipeline. 2) I think we need a plan to get our coverage up to 80%
2.1) Either leave it at 30% now and create ticket(s) to add more test and increase it to 80% OR 2.2) Increase it to 80%, let the pipeline give warning. Add tickets to increase it to 80% then change it to fail.
cc: @umsu2
Another question, since our coverage does not meet the 80% threshold. What happens?
I believe that if our coverage doesn't meet 80% threshold then whenever we try to make pull request merge it will fail.
That's weird, I don't see any checks.
- I think we need to ensure that if the coverage is not above 80% it fails the pipeline.
- I think we need a plan to get our coverage up to 80%
2.1) Either leave it at 30% now and create ticket(s) to add more test and increase it to 80% OR 2.2) Increase it to 80%, let the pipeline give warning. Add tickets to increase it to 80% then change it to fail.
cc: @umsu2
no checks because the PR is not up to date with master @alchuu00 let me know when you have time we can go over resolving git conflicts.
and in terms of coverage report. it does get generated automatically when we run tests. BUT the coverage report (html) gets thrown away unless we store/host them somewhere.
@umsu2 I removed date from the coverage report filename
I am not sure which folders and files should I exclude from the report? Also I am not sure if treshold 80% is okay? Many articles state 80% is good to aim for.