Closed abargnesi closed 8 years ago
complex( kin( p(HGNC:JAK2) ) )
should NOT be semantically valid. Maybe this is a mistake in the BEL 1.0 implementation?
Yeah it looks that way. Here was my experience running this through the BelCheck tool.
Thanks for the clarification. We will make sure to correct the semantics in BEL 1.0 & 2.0 implemented in OpenBEL/parsers.
We may want to consider a patch to OpenBEL Framework.
Added OpenBEL/openbel-framework#67
BEL 1.0 declared abundance as the return type for specific activity types (e.g. kinaseActivity). This implies that the following is semantically valid:
Given the following function signatures of kinaseActivity and complexAbundance:
Does this hold true for BEL 2.0's general-purpose activity function?
@ncatlett