Adding entity types would let the user be able to filter based on them in the entities list. They would further improve the user experience in combination with f.e. <Badge variant="secondary">Movie</Badge>.
Extracting entity types for OpenBioLink would be pretty easy, however for FB15 the Google Knowledge Graph API only provides two classifications: @types (A list of schema.org types, f.e. [City, Thing, AdministrativeArea, Place]) and description (A short description of the entity, f.e. "city in switzerland"). While description is too specific to be used as entity type, @types could be used, however entities would have multiple types.
Adding entity types would let the user be able to filter based on them in the entities list. They would further improve the user experience in combination with f.e.
<Badge variant="secondary">Movie</Badge>
.Extracting entity types for OpenBioLink would be pretty easy, however for FB15 the Google Knowledge Graph API only provides two classifications:
@types
(A list of schema.org types, f.e. [City, Thing, AdministrativeArea, Place]) anddescription
(A short description of the entity, f.e. "city in switzerland"). Whiledescription
is too specific to be used as entity type,@types
could be used, however entities would have multiple types.