Optimize build ssh clone url method

[pulltheflower]

• Optimize build ssh clone url method

MR Summary:

The summary is added by @codegpt.

The Merge Request optimizes the method for building SSH clone URLs in the repository utility code. Key updates include:

1. Added URL parsing to handle different domain formats.
2. Improved logic to construct SSH URLs based on whether the domain includes a port.
3. Removed outdated logic that checked for a port in a less efficient manner.

[starship-github[bot]]

Possible Issues And Suggestions:

• common/utils/common/repo.go

  • Comments:
  • The error from url.Parse is not logged or handled beyond returning an empty string. This could obscure the root cause of issues.
  • Suggestions:

    if err != nil {
    log.Printf("Error parsing domain URL: %v", err)
    return ""
    }

• common/utils/common/repo.go

  • Comments:
  • Returning an empty string on error may lead to downstream issues. Consider returning an error to the caller.
  • Suggestions:

    // Change the function signature to return an error as well
    func buildSSHCloneURL(domain string, repoType types.RepositoryType, path string) (string, error) {

• Line 77 in common/utils/common/repo.go

  • Comments:
  • The check for url.Port() == "" assumes default SSH port. Explicitly handling common SSH ports could improve clarity and reliability.
  • Suggestions:

    if url.Port() == "" || url.Port() == "22" {

MR Evaluation:

This feature is still under test, evaluation are given by AI and might be inaccurate.

After evaluation, the code changes in the Merge Request get score: 82.

Analysis for the evaluation score:

- The code change may not include corresponding unit tests. - The code change may not include corresponding integration testing. - The code change may not include an exception capture mechanism. - The code change may not include a logging mechanism.

Tips

### CodeReview Commands (invoked as MR or PR comments) - `@codegpt /review` to trigger an code review. - `@codegpt /evaluate` to trigger code evaluation process. - `@codegpt /describe` to regenerate the summary of the MR. - `@codegpt /secscan` to scan security vulnerabilities for the MR or the Repository. - `@codegpt /help` to get help. ### CodeReview Discussion Chat There are 2 ways to chat with [Starship CodeReview]( https://starship.opencsg.com): - Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by StarShip. Example: - `@codegpt How to fix this bug?` - Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag `@codegpt` in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples: - `@codegpt generate unit testing code for this code snippet.` Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the MR/PR comments. ### CodeReview Documentation and Community - Visit our [Documentation](https://opencsg.com/docs/StarShip/codereview/) for detailed information on how to use Starship CodeReview.

About Us:

Visit the OpenCSG StarShip website for the Dashboard and detailed information on CodeReview, CodeGen, and other StarShip modules.

[starship-github[bot]]

The StarShip CodeReviewer was triggered but terminated because it encountered an issue: The MR state is not opened.

Tips

### CodeReview Commands (invoked as MR or PR comments) - `@codegpt /review` to trigger an code review. - `@codegpt /evaluate` to trigger code evaluation process. - `@codegpt /describe` to regenerate the summary of the MR. - `@codegpt /secscan` to scan security vulnerabilities for the MR or the Repository. - `@codegpt /help` to get help. ### CodeReview Discussion Chat There are 2 ways to chat with [Starship CodeReview]( https://starship.opencsg.com): - Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by StarShip. Example: - `@codegpt How to fix this bug?` - Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag `@codegpt` in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples: - `@codegpt generate unit testing code for this code snippet.` Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the MR/PR comments. ### CodeReview Documentation and Community - Visit our [Documentation](https://opencsg.com/docs/StarShip/codereview/) for detailed information on how to use Starship CodeReview.