OpenChain-Project / Curriculum

material designed to help organizations meet the training and process requirements of the OpenChain Specification
Creative Commons Zero v1.0 Universal
30 stars 20 forks source link

Inconsistent use of OSS/FOSS in the slides #1

Closed silverhook closed 6 years ago

silverhook commented 6 years ago

In slides/openchain-curriculum-for-1-1.* I found a few inconsistencies in the slides regarding the use of FOSS and OSS.

The biggest issue is on slide 13, where it says (emphasis mine):

• One popular set of licenses are those approved by the FOSS Initiative (OSI) based on their FOSS Definition (OSD). A complete list of OSI-approved licenses is available at http://www.opensource.org/licenses/

…which is obviously wrong and should be fixed to “Open Source Initiative” and “Open Source Definition” respectively. It does makes me believe this is just a little bug caused by a simple s/Open Source/FOSS search-and-replace.

Another similar issue, where the wording needs to be changed to “FOSS components” (problem emphasised in bold):

slide 53:

• Compliance management is a set of actions that manages OSS components used in products. Companies may have similar processes in place for proprietary components. FOSS components are called "Supplied Software" in the OpenChain specification.

shanecoughlan commented 6 years ago

Hi Matija!

Thanks for reporting. I have also added the OpenChain Curriculum mailing list for reference.

Regards

Shane

On Sep 27, 2017, at 24:32 , Matija Šuklje notifications@github.com wrote:

In slides/openchain-curriculum-for-1-1.* I found a few inconsistencies in the slides regarding the use of FOSS and OSS.

The biggest issue is on slide 13, where it says (emphasis mine):

• One popular set of licenses are those approved by the FOSS Initiative (OSI) based on their FOSS Definition (OSD). A complete list of OSI-approved licenses is available at http://www.opensource.org/licenses/ http://www.opensource.org/licenses/ …which is obviously wrong and should be fixed to “Open Source Initiative” and “Open Source Definition” respectively. It does makes me believe this is just a little bug caused by a simple s/Open Source/FOSS search-and-replace.

Another similar issue, where the wording needs to be changed to “FOSS components” (problem emphasised in bold):

slide 53:

• Compliance management is a set of actions that manages OSS components used in products. Companies may have similar processes in place for proprietary components. FOSS components are called "Supplied Software" in the OpenChain specification.

— You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub https://github.com/OpenChain-Project/curriculum/issues/1, or mute the thread https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/ADctRwmvZlB36KXR9tK5d56PkCYNOfnlks5smRjwgaJpZM4Pkcdo.

silverhook commented 6 years ago

Thanks @zvr 👍