Address regression introduced with PyDSDL v1.14

[pavel-kirienko]

This was reported this morning by @PonomarevDA

The PyDSDL v1.14 changeset is here: https://github.com/UAVCAN/pydsdl/pull/77

The PyDSDL v1.15 changeset is here: https://github.com/UAVCAN/pydsdl/pull/80

I also removed Python 3.6 from the classifiers but this does not address the root of the problem, which is that we have the same information listed in several places, and it is certain that inconsistencies will occasionally emerge. I suggest removing the list of Python versions from the classifiers.

[pavel-kirienko]

@thirtytwobits

[thirtytwobits]

I'm not okay with removing Python 3.6 support. Is that a requirement for this change?

[pavel-kirienko]

I can go back and restore Python 3.6 support in PyDSDL but what do we need that for?

[thirtytwobits]

I can go back and restore Python 3.6 support in PyDSDL but what do we need that for?

An ability to retrofit existing systems.

[sonarcloud[bot]]

Kudos, SonarCloud Quality Gate passed!   

0 Bugs
0 Vulnerabilities
0 Security Hotspots
2 Code Smells

100.0% Coverage
0.0% Duplication

[pavel-kirienko]

@thirtytwobits support for Python 3.6 is back