Closed jwillemsen closed 2 weeks ago
I don't want to unconditionally require 2017 by default and we're still trying to evaluate what we want to do in both OpenDDS and ACE/TAO.
When you want to keep ACE7/TAO3 at C++14 I am ok with releasing ACE8/TAO4 as next release with C++17 as minimum required level.
@jwillemsen We believe it would simplify things for users if we maintain the same requirements of the C++ language standard for all of the ACE7/TAO3 releases. Changing to C++17 in ACE8/TAO4 would be perfectly acceptable.
Ok, will update ACE/TAO master that the next release will be a major one