@acorbi @prustar I'm not sure if there's a document somewhere describing why we decided to only provide license options we currently have for CKAN record -- I'm wondering whether it's intentional to not list CC licenses with NC and ND on CKAN? Some NGOs publish their publications with CC BY-NC-SA or CC BY-NC-ND. MRLG is an example. See: http://mrlg.org/resources/customary-tenure-in-the-mekong-region-workshop-outcomes/
Should we consider other licenses to be added?
Consider the following (except BY and BY-SA which we already have as options)
acorbi
commented
7 years ago
@acorbi @prustar I'm not sure if there's a document somewhere describing why we decided to only provide license options we currently have for CKAN record -- I'm wondering whether it's intentional to not list CC licenses with NC and ND on CKAN? Some NGOs publish their publications with CC BY-NC-SA or CC BY-NC-ND. MRLG is an example. See: http://mrlg.org/resources/customary-tenure-in-the-mekong-region-workshop-outcomes/
Should we consider other licenses to be added?
Consider the following (except BY and BY-SA which we already have as options)