Beginners Guide: How to upload data to the OpenEnergy Platform and initiate the review process not up to date

[vismayajochem]

Description of the issue

• [ ] 1. In section 1 the screenshots don't represent the current design of the web pages. (see also comment on issue #220) The picture for the registration to OEP and the screenshot with the information as well as the screenshot of the contact form don't look like the webside currently looks like.

• [x] 2. In section 2.1 the reader is asked to jump to 2.1.4 but cannot do so because there is no link implemented to jump to set section. In the sentence before 'section 2' has also no link implemnted so the reader can easily jump there.

• [ ] 3. In section 2.1 the link requests package gives an error message.

• [ ] 4. In section 2.2 the linked file github can not be found.

• [ ] 5. in section 2.2 in one sentence the grammar is not fully correct: Once your data table(s) have been uploaded to model_draft schema on the OpenEnergy Platform...

Steps to Reproduce

3./4. Click on the link

Ideas of solution

1. Make new screenshots and implement them correctly.
2. Either also have the verb in singular form (has) or decide to write the whole sentence either in singular or in plural form. E.g. Once your data table(s) has(have) been uploaded to model_draft schema on the OpenEnergy Platform...

Context and Environment

• Version used:
• Operating system:
• Environment setup and (python) version:

Workflow checklist

• [ ] I am aware of the workflow in CONTRIBUTING.md

[vismayajochem]

In the course 02 - How to get started with the Open Energy Family and Platform the first steps are quite nicely described and have the exact same content. So section How do I get started with the OEP? in the course and 1.1. Register at the OpenEnergy Platform describe the same processes, while the first one represents the current design of the OEP and is formulated nicely and easy to understand, while the second one isn't. Same goes for the following sections regarding github. I don't know if here redundance is a good thing and the best solution is to copy the sections from the course to the tutorial guidebook, or if it makes more sence to link the course in the tutorial.