[ ] Two courses (01 & 05) don't have an introduction text with a link to a git issue to give feedback on this course. An in the ones where there is a link, the introductionary text is differently; some only give the link and others somthing like an abstract, an pverview of the content of the course. This could be made more homogenous.
[ ] In the introduction a studies is quoted. But no link to the study is provided. (In the last section of the course some more informations on the study are given, but for a reader who reads from the beginning this is not foreseeable.)
Steps to Reproduce
1.
4.
5.
Ideas of solution
Describe possible ideas for solution and evaluate advantages and disadvantages.
Description of the issue
First some general things:
[ ] Two courses (01 & 05) don't have an introduction text with a link to a git issue to give feedback on this course. An in the ones where there is a link, the introductionary text is differently; some only give the link and others somthing like an abstract, an pverview of the content of the course. This could be made more homogenous.
[ ] In the first course 01 - Introduction symbols for links are being introduce. But in the turorials those symbols are not used in the described way. Especially the first two get mixed up a lot. E.g. in 03 - Download - Find and download / interact with data the link to the How to find data on the OEP? (tutorial) should have the other symbol, since the tutorial has no code at all...
Regarding 03 - Download - Find and download / interact with data:
Regarding 05 - The Open Energy Ontology:
Regarding 09 - Open Peer Review:
Steps to Reproduce
1. 4. 5.
Ideas of solution
Describe possible ideas for solution and evaluate advantages and disadvantages.
Context and Environment
Workflow checklist