Open han-f opened 3 months ago
The publication date currently requires month, day and year information. Some publications only have a year (or year and month) publication listed, see for example: https://www.umweltbundesamt.de/sites/default/files/medien/11850/publikationen/39_2023_cc_projektionsbericht_12_23.pdf
It does feel uncomfortable to add more detailed information than available.
If I only add the year but no month and day for example, the date shows up as:
Also allow for less detailed dates of publication
cc @wingechr @l-emele @stap-m
Would it be sufficient to just add the year to simplify?
I am fine with having only the publication year.
I also think this is sufficient
Description of the issue
The publication date currently requires month, day and year information. Some publications only have a year (or year and month) publication listed, see for example: https://www.umweltbundesamt.de/sites/default/files/medien/11850/publikationen/39_2023_cc_projektionsbericht_12_23.pdf
It does feel uncomfortable to add more detailed information than available.
If I only add the year but no month and day for example, the date shows up as:
Ideas of solution
Also allow for less detailed dates of publication
Workflow checklist
cc @wingechr @l-emele @stap-m