Open jh-RLI opened 4 years ago
In the course of a review in the oedatamodel Reop. was asked to allow YYYY as a valid timestamp.
Currently, we just support YYYY-MM-DD or YYYY-MM-DDThh:mm:ss±hh format.
That's a good point and should be added to the comment.
@jh-RLI, if suitable, you could already consider this in your upcoming work on omi.
In the course of a review in the oedatamodel Reop. was asked to allow YYYY as a valid timestamp.
Currently, we just support YYYY-MM-DD or YYYY-MM-DDThh:mm:ss±hh format.