I used omi and when I output each field, the order is not the same as in the schema and there is a difference between the namings. Furthermore, there are also more fields displayed in omi than in the schema.
Here is a list of what I found:
General Keys:
ID = identifier
language = languages
publicationDate = publication_date
context
sourceCode = source_code
grantNo = grant_number
fundingAgency = funding_agency
Spatial and Temporal Keys
referenceDate = reference_date
timeseries = timeseries_collection
start = ts_start
end = ts_end
resolution = ts_resolution
alignment = ts_orientation
aggregationType = aggregation
Source Keys
sources, licenses (In omi.licenses but not in schema)
identifier = title
other_references
text
comment
Contributor Keys
title = name
Resource Keys
All resources are shown with all keys and values at the end which shouldn't happen
There is also a problem that omi only outputs fields with values, if values = null --> these are not shown
I used omi and when I output each field, the order is not the same as in the schema and there is a difference between the namings. Furthermore, there are also more fields displayed in omi than in the schema.
Here is a list of what I found: General Keys:
There is also a problem that omi only outputs fields with values, if values = null --> these are not shown