Decide how to include concepts from STATO ontology

[chrwm]

Description of the issue

For describing data and models, several statistical terms are needed. We need to decide whether to import classes from the STATO ontology. STATO uses BFO as top-level ontology and should be compatible.

Concepts currently needed are

• uncertainty upper limit
• uncertainty lower limit
• @carstenhoyerklick adds terms from their use-case

Discussion from dev-meeting

Ideas of solution

None yet.

Workflow checklist

• [x] I am aware of the workflow for this repository

[carstenhoyerklick]

As discussed in our DLR meeting... if we need some statistical terms, we should have a log into the STATO ontology. Thats why I added Lüder and Faiza here.

[l-emele]

@chrwm : I checked STATO, but found neither uncertainty upper limit nor uncertainty lower limit. But I found

• upper confidence limit: Upper confidence limit is a data item which is a largest value bounding a confidence interval
• lower confidence limit: Lower confidence limit is a data item which is a lowest value bounding a confidence interval

Did you mean that?

As there are axioms 'upper confidence limit' part of some 'confidence interval' and 'lower confidence limit' part of some 'confidence interval', we should also import:

• confidence interval: Upper confidence limit is a data item which is a largest value bounding a confidence interval

[l-emele]

@chrwm @carstenhoyerklick : Should we import confidence interval, upper confidence limit and lower confidence limit from STATO (see my last comment above) or is it something different that you need?

[stap-m]

I'll prepare the STATO import.

[chrwm]

@carstenhoyerklick do you need STATO ontology concepts?