Restructure class Generator

[stap-m]

Description of the issue

There are several issues on subclasses of class 'Generator' #159, #160, #161, #162 and the old issue #55.

1. Before solving those issues, purpose, definition and classification of the class 'generator' should be discussed and updated. Right now, the def disagrees with severals of its subclasses, e.g. 'photovoltaic generator', 'geothermal generator', 'heat generator'.
2. An agreement on the subclass structure should be found.

Ideas of solution

Workflow checklist

• [x] I discussed the issue with someone else than me before working on a solution
• [x] I already read the latest version of the workflow for this repository
• [x] The goal of this ontology is clear to me

I am aware that

• [x] every entry in the ontology should have an annotation
• [x] classes should arise from concepts rather than from words
• [x] class or property names should follow the UpperCamelCase

[stap-m]

The current def of 'Generator' is: A generator is a grid component that converts motive power (mechanical energy) into electrical power for use in an external circuit. Source: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Electric_generator

[akleinau]

The EnArgus wiki (#179) has "Ein Generator wandelt mechanische Energie in elektrische Energie um." as a definition. This is identical to the current definition without the "for use in an external circuit" end

[stap-m]

Right now, generator is a subclass of 'artificial object'. I think this makes sense and is better, than making it a subclass of 'grid component'. Nevertheless, a generator can be (and usually is) also a grid component. Can we solve this with an equivalent class?

A generator is an artificial object that converts motive power (mechanical energy) into electrical power.

[akleinau]

Yes I just had a similar problem with model components in #196. We can make grid component an equivalent class defined as "every entity that is part of a grid"

[akleinau]

@stap-m, @l-emele is there a difference between a Generator and an EnergyGenerator and an ElectricityGenerator?

[l-emele]

A generator in general is a device that generates electricity (= electric energy). It does not necessary has to be from mechanical energy as there are also photovoltaic generators (see #162) and thermoelectric generators. Also a fuel cell can be seen as a a generator.

The generator that uses mechanical energy is usually called electric generator. As electric generators are by far the most common type of generators their name is usually shortened to generator. But for the ontology we should use the more precise names.

[l-emele]

We have decide on a crucial point regarding the definition of a generator:

• Is it the device inside a power plant that produces ("generates") the electricity? This would mean it is one of the parts forming the power plants. In the case of a steam power plant other parts of the plant would be the boiler, the turbine and the block transformer.
• Is it a synonym for power plant? This implies that turbines, boilers etc. would be parts of the generator.

I strongly prefer the first option but a lot of our generator subclasses (e.g. BiogasElectricityGenerator) follow the second logic.

We discussed this already a bit on the project meeting in Magdeburg in January 2019 but we came there to no final conclusion.

[akleinau]

I found the class PowerGeneratingUnit with no definition but the relations uses some EnergyGeneratorTechnology, EnergyStorageTechnology, EnergyTransferTechnology. Is that a synonym to Powerplant?

[l-emele]

In the current structure Powerplant and PowerGeneratingUnit are synonyms.

[akleinau]

what was the problem when discussing it 2019? I'd prefer the first one too.

[l-emele]

Simply the lack of time. We had a discussion on the ontology in general and stumbled over the generator and it's different possible definitions but had no time to find a general consensus.

[stap-m]

Yes, the first one.

[l-emele]

So we have a consensus on this long standing topic!

[akleinau]

ok subclasses of Generator right now are:

• ElectricityGenerator
  • FossilGenerator
  • GasTurbineGenerator
  • RenewableGenerator
• EnergyGenerator
  • SolarThermalCollector
  • TidalStreamGenerator
  • Turbine
• Geothermalgenerator
• HeatGenerator
• InternalCombustionVerhicle
• PhotovoltaicGenerator

which ones have to be moved? (I didnt listed all subclasses for clarity)

[stap-m]

We need a def for Generator if we want to continue with its subclasses, e.g. in PR #235.

• What do we want to express with the term 'Generator'? We agreed on this:

  Is it the device inside a power plant that produces ("generates") the electricity?

• If in our def every device that produces electricity is called 'Generator, it is confusing to talk about an 'electricGenerator' if it uses mechanical energy (although is is called like this, e.g. on wikipedia), since EVERY generator generates electricity

  The generator that uses mechanical energy is usually called electric generator.

• We need to clarify what is a power plant that uses a 'Generator' and what is a potential subclass of a 'generator'. In my understanding, a 'Turbine' is such a subclass, a 'SolarThermalCollector' is not. A 'PV cell' could also be a 'Generator'. The term 'PhotovoltaicGenerator' is unfamiliar to me.

• And we have to discuss if thermoelectric generator is useful in an ESM ontology.

[akleinau]

@jannahastings, @MGlauer can you please add your pictures of the Whiteboard here?

[jannahastings]

[MGlauer]

[akleinau]

ok this will be the subclass-structure. This is complex enough that I think the best way is to make a pull request and work directly on the ontology. So I'll try to implement everything and see which problems occur.

First problem: I cant find a def for PowerGeneratingUnit?

[akleinau]

• I'm having problems formulating the definition of EnergyTransformer/ EnergyConverter correct, can someone help me make sense of what's written on the whiteboard?
• if we rename EnergyTransformer to EnergyConverter we need to rename WindEnergyConverter and GasEnergyConverter, the subclasses of PowerGeneratingUnit

[akleinau]

is this the correct powerplant structure?

[l-emele]

If I remember correctly our discussion from last week, we decided to delete the class ReactivePowerplant.

Why do we have HydroPowerplants and HydroelectricPowerplants? This is confusing.

Some hydros are also renewable but not all, e.g. a PumpedStoragePlant without natural intake is not renewable.

[MGlauer]

ok this will be the subclass-structure. This is complex enough that I think the best way is to make a pull request and work directly on the ontology. So I'll try to implement everything and see which problems occur.

First problem: I cant find a def for PowerGeneratingUnit?

IIRC: We renamed EnergyConverter to PowerGeneratingUnit. This was also the reason why we did not rename EnergyTransformer to EnergyConverter yet. Otherwise it would clash with the former definition. Therefore we would rename GasEnergyConverter to GasPowerGeneratingUnit? (sound a bit weird to me)

[l-emele]

Therefore we would rename GasEnergyConverter to GasPowerGeneratingUnit? (sound a bit weird to me)

We might include fired in the class name. GasFiredPowerGeneratingUnit does not sound weird to mee.

[stap-m]

Why do we have HydroPowerplants and HydroelectricPowerplants? This is confusing.

We decided on leaving all hydro-related classes out for the moment. This is another huge area discussion.

[stap-m]

Oh no, I think we neither wrote down a def for PowerGeneratingUnit nor EnergyConverter/Transformer. But at least we discussed it well so it should be possible to recap. Here goes a first attempt:

• An energy converter is an artificial object that transforms or changes a certain type of energy.

• A power generating unit is an artificial object that contains _(haspart some) one or more energy converters, amongst others, to generate electric energy / power edit:

• A power generating unit is an artificial object that contains _(haspart some) one or more energy converters, amongst others, and has the primary goal to generate electric energy / power

[l-emele]

Why do we have HydroPowerplants and HydroelectricPowerplants? This is confusing.

We decided on leaving all hydro-related classes out for the moment. This is another huge area discussion.

Do we have an issue where we collect all water-related problems?

[stap-m]

We might include fired in the class name. GasFiredPowerGeneratingUnit does not sound weird to me.

I don't think each subclass of PowerGeneratingUnit needs the suffix PowerGeneratingUnit. We already have PVPanel that doesn't fit the scheme. What about GasFiredPowerUnit and WindDrivenPowerUnit ?

[l-emele]

In the pictures above there is the definition for energy converter: An energy converter is an artificial object that has part some generator (and other stuff).

[l-emele]

What about GasFiredPowerUnit and WindDrivenPowerUnit ?

I am probably fine with GasFiredPowerUnit. We have decided last week on WindEnergyConverter instead of WindDrivenPowerUnit .

[stap-m]

In the pictures above there is the definition for energy converter: An energy converter is an artificial object that has part some generator (and other stuff).

This def interfers with the def of generator: A generator is an energy transformer/converter that converts other forms of energy into eletrical energy. I.e. an energyConverter can transorm any type of energy into any type of energy.

[stap-m]

In the pictures above there is the definition for energy converter: An energy converter is an artificial object that has part some generator (and other stuff).

Now I also found this def on the foto. I think this def was made before we renamed energyConverter to PowerGeneratingUnit, where it fits. So at least we have a def for that one 😃

[akleinau]

What do we do with the hydro classes until we address them? delete them? put them away somewhere? just ignore them?

I don't like the "and other stuff" ending of the power generating unit def. What about: A power generating unit is an artificial object that contains a generator amongst other parts."?

[akleinau]

Do we have an issue where we collect all water-related problems?

we have just two water issues so we can just concentrate discussion in one of them, e.g. #43

[akleinau]

What about GasFiredPowerUnit and WindDrivenPowerUnit ?

I am probably fine with GasFiredPowerUnit. We have decided last week on WindEnergyConverter instead of WindDrivenPowerUnit .

the name "WindEnergyConverter" will be confusing as soon as we rename EnergyTransformer to EnergyConverter

[l-emele]

This is not confusing but intended: The WindEnergyConverter is that EnergyConverter that uses WindEnergy.

[stap-m]

Actually the def has to be:, A Wind energy converter is the Power Generating Unit that uses wind energy.

I made an overview with defs:

[l-emele]

One important point in the definition of energy converter is missing: That an energy converter is a device. This word is important to distinguish the levels.

• Device-level: Turbine, Generator, ...
• Unit-level: PV panel, wind energy converter, fossil fired power unit, ...
• Plant-level: Power plant

In the protocol we mention the word device explicitly.

Proposal: An energy converter is a device that transforms or changes a certain type of energy.

BTW: What is the difference between a transformation of energy and a change of energy?

[akleinau]

@l-emele what should do with the subclasses of ReactivePowerplant: HydrogenPowerplant and NuclarPowerplant. Delete?

[l-emele]

I propose delete ReactivePowerplant but make HydrogenPowerplant and NuclearPowerPlant direct subclasses of PowerPlant.

[akleinau]

ok then I have this Powerplant hierarchy (with HydroPowerplant being ignored and looked at later)

[l-emele]

To almost all fuels there is an equivalent PowerPlant and PowerGenerationUnit, e.g.

• HydrogenPowerPlant that has one or more HydrogenPowerGenerationUnits and that uses hydrogen as fuel
• LignitePowerPlant that has one or more LignitePowerGenerationUnits and that uses lignite as fuel
• HardCoalPowerPlant that has one or more HardCoalPowerGenerationUnits and that uses hard coal as fuel

How do we deal with this efficiently? I think could do there a lot by infering.

@jannahastings: Any thoughts?

[l-emele]

The class FieldPhotovoltaicGenerator should be renamed as we defined generator differently. Next to FieldPhotovoltaikPowerPlant I would suggest solar park and solar farm at least as synonyms.

I would be also okay to name it directly solar park, that is a term that is used quite often and is somehow the equivalent term to wind farm. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Photovoltaic_power_station

[akleinau]

We do have a lot of redundancy with the Powerplants and PowerGeneratingUnits and Generators. I personally don't see a more efficient way than just implementing those redundancies, especially because if I understand it correctly there's information added each level. E.g. a WindElectricityGenerator is used in several kind of WindFarms: eg. OffShoreWindFarm and OnShoreWindFarm

[akleinau]

under Generator we have a class BioElectricityGenerator with subclasses Biogas- and BiomassElectricityGenerator. Am I right that we have accordingly also that structure in PowerGeneratingUnit and Powerplant?

[akleinau]

my current structure

[l-emele]

A couple of things I spotted from those screenshots:

• FossilGenerator and RegenerativeGenerator (and their subclasses) are no meaningful subclasses of as in both FossilPowerplants and RenewablePowerplants. Possible subclasses of ElectroMotiveGenerator.
• Potential subclasses of ElectroMotiveGenerator are synchronous & asynchronous generators and AC & DC generators. But for the moment I think we don't need any these subclasses of ElectroMotiveGenerator.
• PVCell should be a direct subclass of Generator on the same hierarchical level as ElectroMotiveGenerator.
• The following direct subclasses of Generator need to be renamed or deleted as they are no generators in our definition:
  • HeatGenerator and subclasses: Needs renaming
  • HydroGenerator can probabaly be deleted
  • HydrogenGenerator: can be deleted (similar to FossileGenerator)
  • NuclearPowerGenerator: can be deleted (similar to FossileGenerator)
• Fossil is spelled without the letter e so it should be FossilPowerplant and FossilPowerUnit.

[l-emele]

under Generator we have a class BioElectricityGenerator with subclasses Biogas- and BiomassElectricityGenerator. Am I right that we have accordingly also that structure in PowerGeneratingUnit and Powerplant?

These classes are not generators any more according to our more precise definition. They need to be renamed and to be redefined. The lables could be something like BiofuelPowerplant with subclasses BiogasPowerPlant and SolidBiomassPowerPlant.

[akleinau]

So are there any more generators than Electromotive and PVCell?

[l-emele]

FuelCell is a generator. I don't know whether we have already FuelCell in our ontology. If not, we should include it.