Popular tags from OEP

[luvogt]

This tags from the OEP I cannot find in the ontology health society Decarbonisation Pathway economy environment Commercial Conventional template Further, the green tags are licenses or something (see issue#31)

[han-f]

It may be worthwhile to discuss which of these

• are very relevant in climate- and energy modelling
• can be defined straight-forwardly enough to be added to the ontology.

I am wondering whether several of the tags added by users may be too specific to be included in the ontology? (e.g. ding0, H-2020, DSM, KSz 2050 etc.). What about tags that have different names, but may mean the same?

[l-emele]

Split into separate issues.

[sfluegel05]

Here is an overview of the tags mentioned above and my opinions on them:

Tag	used in factsheets	needed in the OEO
health	no	no
society	model 168, model 169	no, I don't see the connection between the factsheets and the term society, connecting it to specific sectors would be more precise
Decarbonisation Pathway	models 27, 31, 40 and 68	yes, seems to be an important property of models
economy	models 68, 168 and 169	yes
environment	no	no
Commercial	no	no, already covered by commercial sector
Conventional	models 27, 31, 58 and 169	yes
template	no	no

I will open new issues for the tags needed in the OEO.

We should also have a look at the other OEP-tags. I noticed that most tags are not used by any factsheets, which seems a bit odd to me. Do they serve another purpose than annotating factsheets / where do these tags come from? Should we only include tags that are actually used?

[han-f]

I wonder whether this isn't an even larger issue that also requires some harmonising of keywords and tags throughout parts of the OEP ...

1. • There seem to be tags on the OEP that relate to data tables: https://openenergy-platform.org/dataedit/tags - these tags are created by users that upload a data table
2. • Then there seem to be tags that relate to factsheets (as the ones mentioned above) and can be created when creating factsheets (at least there seems to be a functionality, but no buttons appear for me)
3. • There are keywords in the metadata of a data table, e.g. here: https://openenergy-platform.org/dataedit/view/scenario/fh_iee_trafo_fw_viel_dez_bio_hohe_sani_endenergie - that are also created by users who upload data tables, but these keywords are not necessarily identical to the tags mentioned in 1.

In case this harmonising on the OEP makes sense - should that be done first? What would be a good way to proceed? The factsheet tags and data table tags seem to be at least two different sets of tags - can they be connected?

cc @wingechr as I think we already discussed at one point how tags / keywords would enable linking data with factsheets... cc @MGlauer also for your take on this

[l-emele]

In case this harmonising on the OEP makes sense - should that be done first?

From my point of view we definitely need a harmonisation and it should be the first step.

[l-emele]

How do we proceed here? There was the suggestion of harmonising the OEP tasks first. Who is responsible for that? Is it useful to open a parralel issue in the oeplatform repo?

[stap-m]

@Ludee @wingechr @adelmemariani I guess this is something for the OEP dev team.