Closed stap-m closed 3 years ago
I am okay with including these.
We have to keep in mind that in most and especially in commercial nuclear reactors not pure metallic fuels are used but compound nuclear fuels. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nuclear_fuel But I think for our domain ontology it is okay to cut off a the elements uranium/thorium/plutonium and not to deal with the compounds.
Description of the issue
Add classes
plutonium
andthorium
, see #692.Ideas of solution
portion of matter
.nuclear fuel
: fuel and ('has disposition' some 'nuclear energy carrier disposition')Workflow checklist
I am aware that