Closed l-emele closed 2 years ago
Some first proposals:
To describe international bunkers and international aviation, we need further sector individuals:
Thanks @l-emele this reads really good, I wouln't know what to add, except slight changes (bold) here:
Should we also indicate the "category names" for aviation and navigation as in the MMR template, e.g.:
How could we treat the Unique individual identifier in OEO for these special cases?
In the CRF tables and the NIRs, the following codes are used:
I'll start implementing this after merging #941.
Regarding the MMR IDs for international aviation have three options (of course for navigation the same.):
CRF sector (IPCC 2006): international aviation
and one MMR sector I.B aviation
and add the axiom same individual as
between those two.I prefer the second option as in the MMR table the international aviation sector with the unique individual identifier CRF 1.D.1.a is meant, but it is just labeled differently.
Discussed today bilaterally with @han-f:
Add the following alternative terms that are used by EEA with editor note linking to EEA:
For the definition of the last four simply the structure: Total emissions XYZ is a sector that encompasses A and B...
Add editor notes:
Total emissions excluding LULUCF and international aviation
: This definition corresponds to the 2020 emission target of the European Union.Total emissions including LULUCF and international aviation
: This definition corresponds to the 2030 emission target as specified in the Nationally Determined Contribution (NDC) of the European Union . (Side note: We could think about adding nationally determined contribution
as a own concept, but that would be a topic for a new issue.)Add further sector M.International aviation in the EU ETS
from MMR template. Here I have to proposals:
@han-f: Which is the right one? Does the EU-ETS for aviation also cover flights from/to Norway, Iceland and Liechtenstein?
In issue #834 / PR #853 we defined EU emission sector: ETS aviation
as: The EU emission sector ETS aviation is a transport sector defined by the EU emission sector division that covers greenhouse gas emissions regulated by the European Union Emissions Trading System and that are emitted by stationary installations. That definition is of course humbug and probably a copy & paste error. The right definition should be: The EU emission sector ETS aviation is a transport sector defined by the EU emission sector division that covers greenhouse gas emissions regulated by the European Union Emissions Trading System and that are emitted from aviation. As this is related to M.International aviation in the EU ETS
we can and should correct this here in this issue.
New proposal from internal discussion with @han-f and one of our ETS experts: The MMR sector 'M.International aviation in the EU ETS' is a transport sector that encompasses that part of the international aviation that is regulated by the European Union Emissions Trading System. This links to both the EU-ETS and international aviation which we both already have in the OEO.
Further result: What we implemented as MMR sector division
is actually the sector definition of the governance regulation. So we relabel/redefine:
And add:
Description of the issue
In GHG inventories and GHG projections adhering to UNFCCC and European Guidelines, different concepts of total emissions are needed:
And combinations of these...
Ideas of solution
Treat these as CRF sectors
Workflow checklist
I am aware that