During the presentation of the OEP and the development process that I gave in the context of the NFDI, the question was raised whether there is some kind of overview for all our tools and features that indicates fitness for use.
By that I mean an indicator of whether it's early access or whether it's a full feature or maybe our opinion on certain features like "this has been useful to me but it's quite buggy".
I think we do not have something like this?
Maybe we can make a list of our tools and create a fitness for use indicator based on the usefulness of the feature, completeness of the feature, bugs, etc.?
It would be nice to have more than just the developers' perspective in this list.
I am happy to create the list and collect your opinions and try to create the indicator and also maintain the list.
During the presentation of the OEP and the development process that I gave in the context of the NFDI, the question was raised whether there is some kind of overview for all our tools and features that indicates fitness for use. By that I mean an indicator of whether it's early access or whether it's a full feature or maybe our opinion on certain features like "this has been useful to me but it's quite buggy".
I think we do not have something like this?
Maybe we can make a list of our tools and create a fitness for use indicator based on the usefulness of the feature, completeness of the feature, bugs, etc.?
FYI @christian-rli @han-f @stap-m @l-emele @adelmemariani @wingechr
It would be nice to have more than just the developers' perspective in this list. I am happy to create the list and collect your opinions and try to create the indicator and also maintain the list.