search

OpenExoplanetCatalogue / open_exoplanet_catalogue

The main data repository for the Open Exoplanet Catalogue
http://openexoplanetcatalogue.com
1.01k stars 217 forks source link

Update TOI-677.xml #1113

Closed Sol-d closed 1 year ago

Sol-d commented 4 years ago

Corrected coords (SIMBAD)

hannorein commented 4 years ago

Hm. The new coordinates are still inconsistent with this: http://exoplanet.eu/catalog/toi-677_b/

Any idea which ones are correct?

hannorein commented 4 years ago

The original coordinates in the OEC are consistent with the discovery paper: https://arxiv.org/pdf/1911.05574.pdf

Sol-d commented 4 years ago

No, i habe no idea.

Am 23.08.2020 um 16:25 schrieb Hanno Rein notifications@github.com:

 Hm. The new coordinates are still inconsistent with this: http://exoplanet.eu/catalog/toi-677_b/

Any idea which ones are correct?

— You are receiving this because you authored the thread. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub, or unsubscribe.

hannorein commented 4 years ago

Ok. Then I think the best option is to leave it as it is (i.e. the coordinates from the discovery paper).

SevenSpheres commented 2 years ago

It's very odd that the discovery paper has different coordinates, but the coordinates in SIMBAD do appear to be correct. The discovery paper lists designations for this star in the TIC, 2MASS, TYC, and WISE catalogs, all of which give coordinates consistent with SIMBAD and not with the discovery paper. Additionally, the 2MASS and WISE designations are coordinates, which are again consistent with SIMBAD.

SevenSpheres commented 1 year ago

The incorrect coordinates in the discovery paper are noted on the NASA Exoplanet Archive's Discrepancies Between Literature and Archive Values page.