Open hannorein opened 10 years ago
For Bayer designations, my personal preference is to follow SIMBAD here, i.e. use the "omi UMa" form, use the spellings "mu.", "nu.", "ksi", "pi." for μ, ν, ξ and π (bear in mind that MU and NU are valid as variable star designations), and use two digits for numeric superscripts. E.g. "nu.02 Lup".
In any case, having multiple spellings of the same designation is not helpful for machine readability.
We should have as many spellings as possible to allow people to search for the system by whatever name they use.
Any application that provides user search facilities on the database should be able to canonicalise the designation before searching. This is a problem that is better solved by use of string parsing rather than storing multiple spelling variations, which makes it more difficult to use the database in applications that do not need such complexity.
For example, for "omi UMa" We should choose one of the following conventions:
This applies to all planets around "named" stars.