Closed KingMob closed 6 months ago
@KingMob looks great, no extra tests needed if those branches are covered!
@sritchie How do we examine code coverage results? I'm not experienced with these tools.
I clicked thru the coverage check in GH Actions, found a line in the logs saying the report was uploaded, and to go here, but it said the reports are unusable.
Attention: Patch coverage is 75.75758%
with 8 lines
in your changes are missing coverage. Please review.
Project coverage is 75.60%. Comparing base (
95352b2
) to head (013d3ed
).
Files | Patch % | Lines |
---|---|---|
src/inferenceql/query/plan.cljc | 69.56% | 3 Missing and 4 partials :warning: |
src/inferenceql/query/literal.cljc | 88.88% | 1 Missing :warning: |
:umbrella: View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
:loudspeaker: Have feedback on the report? Share it here.
@sritchie The grammar matching should be tested by the strict/permissive parser_test files. Was there another test you wanted to see?